US Attorneys Canned, Part Trois

Something similar --- How about "I have no recollection, Senator."

Does that qualify?

 

Zag --

You can quietly have this argument in your own head.

I don't think anyone else is involved at this point.

 

1,400+ subpoenas (1994-2000) . . . to 3 (2001-2006).

The scoreboard does not lie.

 

I don't know if we can make up that deficit here in the fourth quarter, BTE.
But I'd like to try.

 

I know, I know, you don't care so much that you've now made six posts on the subject. Apparently you are in desperate need of cool points from the cool kids again........

 

You are correct -- that score tells me the Clintons and their pals were a bunch of criminals.

 

Hey, feel free to start a thread about that.

 

Of course it does.

Which is why you're a laughingstock on here.

Given a chance to at least attempt to make an objective analysis of the numbers presented . . . you instead shit the bed.

 

The Clinton Legacy....

RECORDS SET

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

I know, I know --all of it Right-Wing Conspiracy.

 

Oh, I'm a l laughingstock but you liberal clowns spending every waking moment trying to rationalize and/or apoligize for the Slick Willy era have a lot of credibility.

I mean, can you at least concede that maybe one or two of those people connected to the Clintons were bad people and the Clintons probably fractured a law or two and likely abused their power on more than one occassion.

Is that too much to ask?

 

You got it. I agree.

Took me four seconds.

But that scoreboard --- in your eyes --- is an accurate representation of the ethics of each party, right?

Ball's in your court now.

 

What do you mean in my court -- are you saying that there is a whole lot of selective prosecution going on based on party lines?

In Washington? Nah, never. I refuse to believe that.

The Clinton era convinced me to swtich from a Republican to an Independent and that's what I have been ever since.