Troublemaker disrupts panel discussion, gets the big smack-down

Yeah, all she has is slogans, catchphrases and lies. She'd fit in really good here.

 

Good thing there's no political talk allowed 'round here ...

 

Yeah, nobody ever violates that rule. (crossthread)

 

And yet no one has been able to take apart anything she actually said.

Hmmmmmm. I would have thought it would be so simple.

 

Where did she get the number of Muslims who are violent fanatics from? What study?

 

The Milbank column that started it all is very interesting. One guy says he isn't sure at all that Stevens died from smoke inhalation and wants to see the autopsy report. And it wasn't even Alex Jones!

Milbank also follows up by ripping the Politico "reporter" who labeled Milbank's column a "disaster" based on what the Heritage Foundation told the "reporter." It's a nice little Washington catfight all in all.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2014/06/18/politicos-reporting-disaster/?tid=pm_pop

 

Well, there is a good reason why most book stores put "New Republic" magazine in their fiction section.

 

I normally don't much care for Milbank but three cheers for this kicker ...

He might as well have said, "get off your lazy ass and cover something you foof."

 

Do any of you know of Gabriel's background? Check out where she comes from and what she has gone through. When discussing Islam and extremists I would take her word over the word of Dana Millbank, Dylan Byers and anyone at Politico.

She doesn't sugar coat it and does not care if the precious left gets offended...and I don't blame her.

 

From 2010: screech screech screech

http://www.newshounds.us/2010/05/14/antimuslim_zealot_brigitte_gabriels_onesided_debate_on_ground_zero_mosque.php