1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Today's sign of the apocalypse: Selling the naming rights to Wrigley Field????

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by ondeadline, Dec 22, 2007.

  1. KoM

    KoM Member

    Zell showed his true colors (that of any rich a-hole) in a recent quote where he basically said what business is it of anyone what he does with his property.

    He may hold the deed, but the stadium "belongs" to Cubs' fans.
     
  2. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member


    The Cell? NEVAH.

    Ryan Field? NEVAH.

    United Center? NEVAH!
     
  3. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I have no problem with a new stadium being financed with the help of naming rights (if it saves taxpayers a few bucks). But I do wonder if Zell can make back in naming rights what a name switch will cost him in terms of revenue and franchise value. Jeff Gordon when he just called it Wrigley Stadium and he got booed through the Seventh Inning Stretch. I imagine Zell would get the Bartman treatment times 10 if a name change goes through.
     
  4. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    If I were stupidly rich, as a tribute to Lee Elia, I'd pony up the cash and name the place "A Playground for the Cocksuckers."
     
  5. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    15 percent of the working world applauds you.
     
  6. EE94

    EE94 Guest

    Not a huge difference. He named it Wrigley Field to promote the brand
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page