1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The secret meeting your publisher might be attending today

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by 2muchcoffeeman, May 28, 2009.

  1. amoney

    amoney New Member

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  2. Mediator

    Mediator Member

    Let's just hope they figured something out and that the current administration doesn't equate the cooperation in one method of delivery with a traditional monopoly.
     
  3. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    Unless you're Canadian.
     
  4. BrianGriffin

    BrianGriffin Active Member

    I don't see why there is so much negativity over paywalls. From what I see, successful sites have a mix of free and pay content. Newspapers could do the same. For example, Rivals lets you see the Rivals 100, but any detail is behind a paywall. ESPN lets you read basic stuff, but it also has premium content.

    I think newspapers should add pay walls and have three kinds of content: Free content that is the stuff produced for print, pay content that is also available in print (your enterprise work, by and large) and pay content unique to your Site.

    Newspapers also need to compete online at online's terms. That means adjusting what you produce to what the web demands. For every paper, there may be a different conclusion for what that is, but I'll throw this out: Rivals and Scout have filled the void newspapers left by, evidently, undercovering recruiting. So now, online at least, newspapers know where the money can be made in that regard.

    For papers who haven't gutted their print product, I think this can be done. For those who have gutted their print product (the bulk), I'm more pessimistic because your brand may be compromised beyond repair.
     
  5. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    More fodder, from Freedom Newspapers (and sent to me via PM):

    ----------

    Freedom Newspapers to launch smarter and simpler subscription-pricing model

    Call it newspapers’ version of sticker shock: a casual, non-committal reader agrees to a very attractive subscription offer, only to receive an eyebrow-raising bill offering a much higher rate shortly thereafter. The reader does not renew her subscription.

    It’s a vicious cycle – and one of the primary motivators in creating a more intuitive subscription-pricing model across 23 of Freedom’s daily newspapers. Implementation of the new model begins June 1 at the Daily News-Sun newspaper in Sun City, Ariz.

    The News Herald in Panama City, Fla., the Northwest Florida Daily News in Fort Walton Beach, The Lima News in Ohio, the Victorville (Calif.) Daily Press and the Desert Dispatch in Barstow, Calif. will also adopt the model in June, with other Freedom properties to follow suit over the subsequent two months.

    The pricing strategy and resulting new model are based on the fact that U.S. newspapers significantly undervalue subscribers compared to newspapers in other countries, according to Lee Knapp, Vice President of Operations at Freedom. The new strategy will eliminate deep discounting and increase home delivery subscription rates, while at the same time simplifying rate structures and reducing subscriber churn.

    “There’s a tremendous opportunity to standardize our approach and better monetize our circulation,” Knapp said. “Our new model provides some consistency in how we can sensibly raise rates and maintain customers.”

    Freedom hired an industry consultant to review its current practices and create the new model. Subscriber pricing is based on demographic information specific to three tenure segments – new starts, long-term and loyals – and frequency of delivery preferences.

    Prices for each tenure segment are set as a percentage of household income, and vary by frequency and subscription length.

    Below are specific details about the three tenure segments:

    New starts: A new start is defined as a customer who has subscribed for one year or less. To address high churn rates among new starts, the new Freedom model guarantees a subscriber will receive the initial low rate for two years. Rates for each property obviously vary, but duration does not. Locking in a low rate for a longer term is essential to become familiar with and see the value in the product, Knapp said.

    Long-term: Defined as someone who has subscribed for more than one year but fewer than eight years. These are subscribers who appreciate the value of a newspaper subscription but who balance that value carefully against various other options in their daily lives. This requires a careful balance between price and perceived value.

    Loyals: Defined as those who have subscribed for eight years or more, loyals find greater value in a newspaper subscription, have a higher tendency to read on a more frequent basis, and are willing to pay a higher rate. Rates are structured as such.

    While there are risks in raising rates – especially in a down economy, it reinforces the value newspapers can deliver to advertisers looking to reach a quality subscriber base. Added pricing incentives (such as prepaying by credit card) are built in to the model to prevent stops if a subscriber requests a cancellation.

    Conversations about the new model began in February. Freedom hosted six, two- or three-day regional meetings with circulation directors and publishers to discuss the updates. The sessions provided ample time to discuss local market pricing and other questions specific to individual newspapers.

    The current rollout phase involves training customer service teams on how to advise subscribers on the new pricing and frequency of delivery programs.
     
  6. ScribePharisee

    ScribePharisee New Member


    "They're our BITCHES, and the publishers are the dumb pimps."
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  7. thesnowman

    thesnowman Member

    Thank you.

    If that's your biggest concern these days, TwoGloves, I'd say you've got it pretty good.
     
  8. HejiraHenry

    HejiraHenry Well-Known Member

    Fixed.
     
  9. Just what the current situation lacked.
    A secret cabal.
     
  10. topsheep

    topsheep Member

    It will be.
     
  11. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Well, it works around this place ...
     
  12. thesnowman

    thesnowman Member

    We are on the cusp of the first Tweet (awful word) at our shop. Anyone else with experience care to share some insight?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page