The NYT Fills A Gallon Drum Of Fail

So Perle thinks that the utter lack of a post-Saddam plan is on Powell, who didn't even have a seat near the table? Holy crap.

 

And a funny one, too.

 

Perle probably went to sleep after writing that, thinking "Boy, I pulled the wool over their eyes." Big, fat, large-mouth bass fake. Another embarassment, in a
closet overflowing with them.

 

ex-pert: NOUN: 1. A person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject. 2a. The highest grade that can be achieved in marksmanship. b. A person who has achieved this grade

 

Here's another example of fail-ridden writing in the NYT, if you want to call it writing:

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/kristol_bungles_key_fact_in_an.php

 

Don't bother him. He's busy cleaning Quayle's clubs.

 

Is Kristol's lazy writing better or worse than plagarism? Or does he figure the NYT doesn't have a problem quoting sources who are trying to push an agenda with information they don't know to be true and representing it as fact.

 

An all-too-common habit among the neocons of the world.

All. Too. Common.

 

Wingut legacy+wingnut welfare+liberal guilt at the NYT=Fountains of Fail.

 

Given that I can't see much of this thread, I'm going to guess it wasn't a political commentary on the what-the-fuck-was-that bad design of their sports front today.