Tats on a woman - does it do anything for you?

I have a theory on this and after looking of pictures of Megan Fox, I was reminded of this theory.

I want to see if my theory is correct.

 

Small one on an ankle, OK.

Small one on a shoulder, perhaps.

Anywhere else, in any higher number . . . no.

 

It depends on what it is and where it is. I guess tattoos don't do anything for me, good or bad. There's much more to a woman than body art.

 

Hate them. But willing to make exceptions.

 

Tats do NOTHING for me on anyone.

 

If it's a butterfly on her lower back, then I'm kind of jumping to conclusions as to what type of girl she is.

If it's something meaningful to her, small, and hidden, that's a different story.

 

Tattoo on the lower back -- might as well be a bullseye.

By the way, things you learn while checking movie quotes: in Germany, the tramp stamp is called the Arschgeweih, which translates to "ass antlers."

 

QFT. However, the current woman in my life has one--very, very small on her foot. An exception if you will.

 

Hate them unequivocally. If you're a good looking woman, you're a fool to mark up your body like that. And if you're not a good looking woman, I'm probably not interested anyway so do whatever the hell you want.

 

Hate Hate Hate them.

Have you seen the Yellowbook commercial with the hot chick with a "Tom" tatoo on her back and she's marrying Mike?
The girl's cute, but I see the commercial and I'm thinking slut the whole way.

 

Hate them. Hate them. Hate them.

Tramp stamp is a good term. I dated a girl in college who had a rose on her ankle. I didn't like it, but I could deal with it. It's just skanky 99 percent of the time...

 

Wow. Weird. I was JUST thinking of this topic yesterday and I can't remember why.

At any rate, I have zero tolerance for tattoos of any size in any location on any woman. Period.