1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Spoiler alert: You (probably) didn't win a Pulitzer

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by dixiehack, Apr 18, 2016.

  1. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    But I was surprised to learn the New Yorker never had before today (when it snagged two).

    100th Pulitzer prizes announced
     
  2. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    The New Yorker hadn't been eligible before, since it's a mag. Good luck in the future though, figure they haven't won their last.
     
  3. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    SJ.com got robbed after our intense political coverage for the past year.
     
  4. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    They cost us scholarships, dammit!
     
    reformedhack likes this.
  5. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Too many of us vote. It skews the posts.
     
  6. Mr. Mediocre

    Mr. Mediocre Member

    I didn't win one. I'm going to submit a petulant rant to my college newspaper accusing the Pulitzer board of robbing me of my dream.
     
  7. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    While you can usually count on the NYT, and the WP to take home wins for chronicling suffering in some distant part of the globe, I'm glad the board seems to make a point of including one or two "outsider" paper(s) for exposing wrongdoing by local agencies and institutions that could probably be done by any paper with the willingness to do so. Local papers don't have to wait for some natural disaster or calamity to prove their worth to a community.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page