1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Some Indians Fans Wore Red-face to the Wild Card Game

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 3_Octave_Fart, Oct 3, 2013.

  1. I'm with the SP here. On the realm of things to get upset about, fans dressing themselves as the official MLB-sanctioned logo would seem to be far, far, far lower on the offensiveness scale than the fact that such a logo exists at all.

    And frankly, the reason black-face is usually considered offensive is because of the cultural and historical baggage affiliated with it. There may be such baggage associated with "red-face" (I don't know), but somehow I doubt it's as prevalent.
     
  2. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

  3. cyclingwriter

    cyclingwriter Active Member

    they're still shitty
     
  4. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I love watching GIFs like this and imagining the dude jogging in front is running laps around Section 216, for all eternity, just for our amusement.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  5. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Cross them off, then!
     
  6. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    who are 3 people that have never been in my kitchen?
     
  7. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I wonder if they're red-faced about the outrage.
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Dan Snyder is sending his jet.
     
  9. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    White people don't get to decide who should be offended or not offended.
     
  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    You're right, as long as you're OK with the following hypothetical sentence.

    "I understand that you may be/are offended by X. I hope, in turn, that you understand that I don't give a shit that you may be/are offended by X."

    In other words, a white person cannot tell a Native American he shouldn't be offended by the Indians' logo. That same white person, however, should not be prevented from wearing an Indians logo if he so chooses.
     
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Sure. But it should in no way be officially sanctioned. Not anymore.
     
  12. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    +1
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page