So Limbaugh is irrelevant? Hmmm.

Rack him.

 

Especially him.

 

Sorry, no.

The correct answer was, "Repped for real talk."

 

Niiiiiiiiiice!

 

I think Limbaugh is an excellent entertainer, his bits are usually fairly funny and he is obviously better at his job than 95 percent of Americans are at theirs.

I also don't see how it is a bad thing that (whether his "influence" is real or perceived) he has gotten part of the electorate interested in and involved in the democratic process.

That is a good thing -- the more people are engaged the better -- so calling him a "terrorist" or what he is doing "criminal" is just plain silly to say the least.

And it is no different than in 2000 when scores of Pennsylvania Democrats switched their party allegiance so they could vote for McCain (over Bush) in the primary in hopes of weakening him.

Again, getting people out to vote and keeping them engaged in a process is a great thing.

Now, that being said -- here is the story that is completely missed when talking about Rush and Hannity and the rest of their ilk --- The reason they are so interested in talking about Rev. Wright and the Democratic race is that it keeps them from having to talk about McCain, who is, let's face it, one of the least interesting, least inspiring and least credible candidates of our lifetime.

 

Limbaugh (or should I say "Limbummer?" No, I won't say that, because only a douchesack sensibility would find that clever) is "relevant" to mature, political discourse in exactly the same way that McDonalds is "relevant" to a healthy diet.

 

You don't really think that little of Americans, do you?

And I'd say that about just about any radio wonk.

 

And yet, I think he's about 50-50 to win. God bless us, everyone.

 

Sounds like out of control hyperbole to me.

A radio dude being an a-hole is not terrorism. His listeners being a-holes is not terrorism.

Don't cheapen the term by misusing it.

And open primaries are ripe for chicanery. Don't blame Limbaugh for using that to his advantage.

 

Whether you agree with his philosophy or the nonsense he spews for three hours each day, to try and claim anything other than he is very successful at what he does is just plain silly.

 

It's that damn liberal media!

 

He urged people to vote for a particular candidate. Wow. How criminal.
Did he physically force people to vote one way or the other? Did he bribe them?

Didn't think so.