1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Singular and plural nouns and its and their thread

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by UncleHappyPants, Jun 22, 2006.

  1. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    SF you are correct, as usual. This discussion is fine here.
     
  2. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Yeah, I'm the same way. Girls and boys don't get apostrophes; men's and women's do. Whatever.

    There are plenty of exceptions to AP style, where there's not one way to do things (i.e. the plethora of threads on RBI vs. RBIs). It's like religion -- many paths to reach the same damn point. Use what works best and/or makes the most sense to you.
     
  3. jay_christley

    jay_christley Member

    We do boys' and girls'.
    If your using men's as a possessive -- then logically boys' is possessive and not descriptive.

    Heat is a singular plural, so it gets a "their."
    The are the Heat.
    The Heat. The Senators. The Red Sox.
    You wouldn't say, "The Notre Dame." Well, maybe you would if you were the Fighting Irish ;D
    Just because it doesn't get an 's' on the end doesn't mean it isn't plural.

    Yes, I know I'm anal about style. Somebody has to be, right 8)
     
  4. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I may change my name to singular plural.
     
  5. jay_christley

    jay_christley Member

    Damn, and the trademark is still pending. Stupid trademark office.
     
  6. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    The difference between boys/girls/men's/women's, beyond the biological, is actually pretty simple.

    'Boy' or 'girl' stand alone as singular. They need the 's' (with possessive apostrophe, positioned per your house style) to make them plural.(I prefer the terminal apostrophe; otherwise you might be citing an individual girl's individual basketball.)

    'Men' or 'women' are each already plural, so don't need the 's' to make them so. Hence the non-negotiable apostrophe-'s' for possession.

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
     
  7. ARD

    ARD Member

    Agreed. I worked for an SE at a top-15 circ paper who insisted that "Team X ended a nine-game losing streak" was wrong and that it should be "Team X ended a losing streak after nine games." Never did figure that one out. We do what the boss says. At another paper, the publisher hated the phrase "all time" -- he said it covered the past, present and future -- and so banned "all-time leader," etc.

    And I actually prefer the English way. Seems a lot simpler than debating ad nauseam what is singular and what is plural. However, I am not at an English paper, so I use the U.S. guidelines.
     
  8. ARD

    ARD Member

    You were too late anyway.  ;) http://www.sup.org/book.cgi?book_id=3974%203975%20
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page