1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pac-10 suspends Uo-OU officials

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by micropolitan guy, Sep 18, 2006.

  1. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    PAC-10 NEWS





    PAC-10 PENALIZES GAME OFFICIALS AND REPLAY OFFICIALS




    WALNUT CREEK, Calif.--The Pacific-10 Conference has suspended for one game the officiating crew and the instant replay officials that worked Saturday's Oklahoma at Oregon football game and apologized to the University of Oklahoma for the officiating on a key play in the game.


    A review by Pacific-10 Conference officials of video of the game revealed that both the instant replay officials and the game officials assigned by the Conference made errors in the final minute and 12 seconds of the game, Pac-10 Commissioner Tom Hansen said today.


    Oregon won the game 34-33, scoring two touchdowns in the final? 1:12.


    An onside kick by Oregon after its first touchdown was touched by an Oregon player before it had traveled the required 10 yards, and the ball accordingly should have been awarded to Oklahoma at the spot of touching.? Further, while the ball was determined to have been recovered by Oregon by the game officials, video shows an Oklahoma player actually recovered the ball.? That aspect of the play is not reviewable by instant replay by rule.


    The play was reviewed by the instant replay officials, who concurred with the field officials that Oklahoma had touched the ball with Oregon recovering and the play stood as called on the field.


    A subsequent Oregon pass play on which pass interference was called on Oklahoma also was reviewed to see if the forward pass had been touched by a defensive player, thus nullifying the pass interference call.? The replay officials ruled that there was not indisputable video evidence that the touching had occurred. ?


    "The fact that the errors on the onside kick altered the outcome of the game is most unfortunate and unsettling," Hansen said. "We had a solid veteran crew assigned,? and the instant replay official had a fine career as a referee in the Pac-10. We believe in the ability and integrity of each individual involved.? It should be noted that not all of the seven officials were directly involved in the play in question, but the entire crew bears responsibility for every play.? Game officials and replay officials have positions of great responsibility and must be accountable for their actions.


    "Errors clearly were made and not corrected, and for that we apologize to the University of Oklahoma, Coach Bob Stoops and his players. They played an outstanding college football game, as did Oregon, and it is regrettable that the outcome of the contest was affected by the officiating.


    "Because of the ramifications, we are taking action against both the members of the officiating crew and the instant replay official and his assistant.? Each individual will be suspended for one game, and their work in future games closely monitored. ?


    "Officiating on the field is much more difficult than it appears from the stands, and certainly when watching repeated replays. Plays occur at a high rate of speed. Decisions on the field must be made instantaneously. The training and experience of officials at this level enable them to work at a high degree of accuracy.? Unfortunately, at the critical moment of this game errors were made," Hansen stated.


    "Further, the instant replay official is limited to the views of any play which is made available and must make a timely decision, although on the kickoff play ample views were available," he concluded.
     
  2. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Yikes.
     
  3. doubledown68

    doubledown68 Active Member

    Ok, if we want to make them accountable, then where are their names in the story?
     
  4. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    Kickoff time: 12:36 End of Game: 4:30 Total elapsed time: 3:54
    Officials: Referee: Cutaia,David; Umpire: Angel, Dennis; Linesman: Antonietti, Dan;
    Line judge: Alonzo, Manuel; Back judge: Hudson, Steve; Field judge: Spriesterbach D;
    Side judge: Curschman David; Scorer: Mowrer, Bob;
    Temperature: 62 Wind: S SE @ 7 Weather: Partly Sunny

    Replay official was Gordon Reise, a veteran Pac-10 official/high school administrator from suburban Portland, who retired several years ago.
     
  5. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Sometimes . . . there's God . . . so quickly . . .
     
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Normally I am not in favor of capital punishment, but in this case it may be warranted.
     
  7. Oz

    Oz Active Member

    Oklahoma's president thought more should have been done. Shock, huh?

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2593369

     
  8. HandsomeHarley

    HandsomeHarley Well-Known Member

    The biased pieces of shit should have been canned.
     
  9. I was watching the game on TV, and I'll cut the officials on the field some slack, because calls do get missed. But the replay official could have saved their butts had he done his job.
     
  10. Johnsonville

    Johnsonville Member

    I wonder if some coach will ever have the balls to forfeit a game under these circumstances. Unrealistic? Yes. But it would teach a good lesson to kids. There is precedent, too, from Dartmouth and Cornell in 1940.
     
  11. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    1940? Come on. Ain't shit going to happen after this.
     
  12. Lester Bangs

    Lester Bangs Active Member


    Shouldn't the Oklahoma president have more pressing matters to be concerned with ...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page