1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

No steak for O.J.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Bob Slydell, May 9, 2007.

  1. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    "T-Bone? Why not G-Bone?"

    "There's no G-Bone."

    "There's a G-Spot."

    "That's a myth!"
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member


    No steak for you, OJ!
  3. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Even with all of those years of the O'Connor Court, I don't think "acquitted murderer" is a protected class, yet. I wouldn't put anything past Kennedy going forward.
  4. Yawn

    Yawn New Member

    Calling these people:

  5. zagoshe

    zagoshe Well-Known Member

    "We reserve the right....."

    Isn't that what that Nazi skinhead Army-Navy store owner in Falling Down said when he kicked the two homo's out of his store?

    Isn't this the same?
  6. Trouser_Buddah

    Trouser_Buddah Active Member

    You'll have to clarify your point for me...During the reading of the verdict they used the words "Not guilty"...they did not say he was found innocent. And in the AP Style book, it says not guilty is preferred to innocent because it is more precise legally...

    Your point, sir?
  7. Uh, no.
  8. novelist_wannabe

    novelist_wannabe Well-Known Member

    I might be taking a little lattitude here, but if a customer came in and was being loud and boisterous and disrupting the dining of others, would he not have license to ask that person to leave? I mention that because one might argue that, given his past, Simpson's mere presence creates a disruption. 'Course, that's not what Ruby said. He made it plain he felt Simpson was guilty regardless of the court decision.
  9. markvid

    markvid Guest

    Good for this owner.
    OJ is a disruption, and needs to be treated like the scum he is.
  10. Yawn

    Yawn New Member

    Then again, O.J. was ruled innocent. Wouldn't a liberal treat him like he was American of the Year?
  11. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

  12. Yawn

    Yawn New Member

    A jury said he was innocent......regardless of the evidence....

    I don't think he's innocent. But legally, he is.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page