Newsday to charge for Web access

http://gawker.com/5458766/newsday-we-dont-care-about-paid-online-subscribers-duh

MEMORANDUM

To: All Local Media Staff

From: Tad Smith

Date: January 28 2010

Re: Update on newsday.com Strategy

As some of you may have seen, the press had a little fun with a recent remark Newsday Publisher Terry Jimenez made at an employee meeting. In response to a question, Terry said that we had approximately three dozen subscribers who have signed up to pay $5 per week for access to newsday.com. This made its way into the media, which inevitably focused on the very low number of subscribers and declared newsday.com a "disappointment." Despite my reluctance to enter this media scrum, I wanted all of us to understand clearly newsday.com's strategy and to share in my genuine satisfaction with results thus far as well as optimism for the future. The strategy for Newsday's website uniquely derives from its carriage on Cablevision. Newsday.com creates value for its shareholders when it publishes high quality content that people desire. And, unlike other publishing websites, Cablevision has millions of high-speed Internet customers plus hundreds of thousands of Newsday home delivery subscribers who pay a fee each month to receive services. Therefore, Newsday's web strategy has two parts: 1) to provide Newsday's print subscribers with a rich web experience that goes far beyond what they can get in the newspaper alone, thereby motivating them to remain, return, or choose to subscribe to Newsday; and 2) to provide Cablevision's high-speed Internet customers with reasons to remain with Cablevision, reasons to return to Cablevision, or reasons to choose Cablevision.

The way to measure success for newsday.com is not, therefore, to count how many people sign up to pay $260 per year for access to the website. Our objective instead is to grow our target audience's utilization of newsday.com's great content and tools. How does this create value? Those who value the website's benefits are more likely to be retained as Cablevision or Newsday subscribers, and the enhanced retention improves the economics of our business. This is quite similar to the value that is created by a targeted local cable network offered on your cable service.

As such, the newsday.com strategy is entirely different from the strategies pursued by other current and prospective online publishers. Other online publishers do not sell high-speed Internet services. They must sell their services to customers one by one. In short, newsday.com is unique in the advantages it brings Cablevision and vice versa and we like it that way.

You will hear more communication in coming weeks describing newsday.com's performance but let me just say that, for now, we are on the right track. Consistent with our strategy, the performance measure to focus on (nowhere else reported) is the change in unique visitors compared year over year in the New York metro area (our target audience): after a website redesign, platform change, gate implementation, and Google's flagging the site as "subscription," our reported visitors in the New York metro area declined by a remarkably low 2 percent: from 657,000 in December 2008 to 643,000 in December 2009. And while we are encouraged at the minimal loss after all those changes, we are committed to winning those unique visitors back and growing from there.

 

Why charge then? I said it on another thread. No one will keep a cable or print subscription to access Newsday.com for free. It's a freebie, along with offering e-mail accounts.

Tad Smith talks about synergy, but there isn't. Real synergy is integrating MSG, Cablevision and Newday on the Web. By the way, Newsday.com looks like a bad TV network Web site and not a good newspaper site.

 

http://www.longislandpress.com/2010/03/04/how-cablevision-is-destroying-newsday/