1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Nevermind....faith has been restored. ;P

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by spikechiquet, Apr 9, 2016.

  1. spikechiquet

    spikechiquet Well-Known Member

    All good in the hood.
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2016
  2. expendable

    expendable Well-Known Member

    If you're writing about how you're not going to cover them, there's no need to tell the team's record and the next opponent in the final graph.
    spikechiquet likes this.
  3. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Who the fuck checks that paper for minor league soccer info?

    We had one of these stories in England. There, the team matters and the paper was screwed. Here? Fuck 'em. The paper doesn't need that shit.
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    And that's sad that you see it that way. The team's "side" is that the pesky business reporter shouldn't be asking question about a lawsuit against the owner, who is a prominent businessman in town. That's complete bullshit.
  5. spikechiquet

    spikechiquet Well-Known Member

    I can see it...I don't agree...but I see their foolish point.
    I have no clue how much they get covered...but I would continue to cover them and be a pest the whole time...just to be a thorn in their side. That's what I am getting at.
  6. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    spikechiquet likes this.
  7. spikechiquet

    spikechiquet Well-Known Member

    Ah. I saw this on my FB feed through OurSports Central, so I didn't dig into it after that. Thanks Moddy!
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page