N.Y. Chapter of N.O.W. blasts Kennedy's betrayal

Probably could have put this in the Ted Kennedy thread, but I thought it deserved its own thread.
Should I have expected a women's rights group to blast a senator that has defended women's rights because he doesn't endorse a woman?
I'm surprised they're not blasting Obama's betrayal for getting in Hillary's way for her run to the White House.



http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

 

Agree with everything you said, EStreet. I suppose anyone who doesn't vote for Hillary is a misogynist. What do the ladies of SportsJournalists.com think of NOW's position.

 

It was brought up already in the Kennedy thread.

I don't see how it affects them. I mean, is an Obama presidency going to be bad for women?

 

I am going to hope this story is from The Onion.

 

I don't think they believe that. I think a Hillary surrogate made a phone call, honestly.

 

Christ, what a bunch of maroons.
Ever closer, zeke. Ever closer.

 

You know you want it, FB.

 

In defense of NOW, it should be pointed out that this is the position of the NY Chapter - Hillary's adapted home state. The national NOW chapter is weakly trying to disassociate itself from that position.

 

I remain Fired Up.
Ready To Go???????
My feet seem to be moving...

 

I missed it in the Kennedy thread -- must've gotten lost in the debate on JFK's legacy.

 

Oh, I realize that. NOW, as a whole, is way too smart and perceptive to alienate the next potential President with a baseless campaign smear. It's still an untenable position, local chapter or no.

 

That's entirely understandable.