1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Michael Moore targetted by U.S. Treasury Department

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Double J, May 10, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    They deserve more than a few of those.

    Fucking Gambinos in the White House.
     
  2. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    No, it's not a joke. If they were caught, they'd be in serious trouble. The law is the law. No travel is allowed to Cuba, unless you jump through enough hoops to make Evel Knievel jealous.
     
  3. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    The law is the law is perhaps the most lazy argument to justify selective enforcement I've ever heard.

    Do you really need me to start naming other things that are or were against the law that everyone who has posted on this thread has broken often?
     
  4. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    So you're going with the "woe as me, the Feds are picking on Moore" tack? With the case of those scufflaw spring breakers going to Havanna, the Feds have no proof that they went. So no prosecution is likely.

    But Michael Moore, on the other hand, has evidence of his trip on film. Imagine that! Add to that all of the interviews he's giving, talking about his trip to Cuba and just daring the Feds to bust his ass.

    I'll be frank. I hate Michael Moore. He's a liar, a con artist, a hypocrite (how can he be so virulently socialist yet pocket tons and tons of cash) and he's very annoying to boot. He's in the Michael Savage and Keith Olberman wing of nutcases who make politics a fetid swamp of boorish miscreants who try to out-shout each other. I can't stand it.

    Prosecuting him is not selective enforcement. When you wave a smoking joint in front of a cop, rather than smoking it smartly and discretely in the privacy of your home, you deserve what you get. Same with Moore.

    It's all about making him a martyr in the eye of the "progressives," Moveon.org crowd or whatever the far left calls themselves these days. And it'll work and drum up publicity and more ticket sales for another pedestrian "documentary" chocked with the kind of half truths and distortions that'd make Joseph Goebbels proud.
     
  5. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Oh, I get it.

    Moore's a socialist.

    Everything's so much clearer now.

    Thanks for clearing that up for me.
     
  6. three_bags_full

    three_bags_full Well-Known Member

    Then he broke a petty law and shall pay a petty price.

    Just like you and I when we speed and are caught.
     
  7. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    Lemme see...
    Moore favors government run health care, more Federal redistribution of income via various giveaway vote-buying schemes, Federal control or at least a lot of intervention into the affairs of corporations, exorbiant income taxes (following the Marxist truism of "From each according to his ability to each according to his need), a gun ban and a living wage.

    Sounds like socialism to me.

    But that aside, do you not agree with my point about breaking the law in secret vs. flouting the law for all to see?
     
  8. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    I think in a few short posts you have shown yourself not worthy of having any kind of debate about this with, and, frankly, I tire of trying to explain that anything less than an evangelical belief in the purity of capitalist markets does not equal socialism.

    So, no.
     
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    No offense, Zeke, but all you've done is dismiss the guy.

    In contrast, he's pretty much spelled out why he doesn't like Michael Moore and he's made an argument about why he believes Moore's attention-tactics put the Feds in a position where they had act, even if it's no win, because Moore will milk it for publicity.

    He seems worthy enough for the thread to me based on what he's posted.
     
  10. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Eh, you might be right.

    I'm still not having the conversation again.
     
  11. Oh, please, let Mr. 28 percent and his pet DOJ take this one to court.
    And, Ragu, all due and al; that, but anyone who thinks MM is a Marxist couldn't have found one at Stalin's stag party. I mean, honestly.
     
  12. zagoshe

    zagoshe Well-Known Member

    Fenian -- Are you supporting Michael Moore?

    I mean, he is no bigger of a self-promoting, mostly irrelevant, grandstanding windbag than, say, Jason Whitlock who you spend the better part of every day ripping in some way shape or form on these threads.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page