Look at my (Anthony) Weiner

Seems like Mr. Weiner could possibly be in a bit of a "pickle."

http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/05/28/weinergate-congressman-claims-facebook-hacked-as-lewd-photo-hits-twitter/

 

Would love a Weiner scandal -- if just for the double entendres.

A little hard to believe, though.

 

That's what I thought, too. But on Redstate.com they are talking about how they are scrubbing the net of this woman (the reciepient) and show how improbable his account was hacked.

http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2011/05/28/anthony-weiner-and-his-eponymous-twitter-hack/

I seriously hope this story has legs because this obnoxious little douche deserves everything he gets.

 

Accepting his version, that he was hacked, is easier to accept if you don't know anything about Twitter.

 

OK, so I guess I could see how you could publicly tweet something instead of sending a direct message, but how does yfrog work?

Can you make a picture on there private for one intended recipient?

 

What's more likely? A media-savvy congressman publicly messaging a picture of his underwear erection to a random college student or his account being hacked (which happens, despite HH's assertions)?

But I'm glad you came with Doucheturd Breitbart and Redstate as your sources. Makes it easier to mock you.

POLITICO! was more skeptical.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55877.html

 

Apparently this woman (who received the tweet) has posted that Weiner was her "boyfriend" before. And, of course, the first step is to marginalize the messenger, right secretariat? Not gonna work, big boy.

 

Stop talking. I'm too busy mocking you.

 

Back in your stall, Triple Crown winner.

 

Too bad I'm not Carlton. Then I could tell you to blow me and get away with it.

 

I'll be shocked if it wasn't Breitbart who hacked the account in the first place.

Totally shocked.

 

This was a few days ago..

The aggressive response by Breitbart makes sense because they can't debate facts.