1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

List of Costs under Bush/McCain

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Lugnuts, Mar 17, 2008.

  1. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    Whoa. Where are we getting Socialism here?
     
  2. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    Does freedom still cost a buck oh-five?
     
  3. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Crazy is as crazy does, jg.
     
  4. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    There's a biblical injunction against drawing attention to your good works.

    Benny Hinn might not have told you that.
     
  5. RedSmithClone

    RedSmithClone Active Member


    So now I worship Benny Hinn? Yes, I join the other Kool-Aid drinkers in worshiping at the alter of a con-artist.
     
  6. Herbert Anchovy

    Herbert Anchovy Active Member

    You mean the unelected president?
     
  7. D-Backs Hack

    D-Backs Hack Guest

    Yeah, New Orleans is a port where thousands of people work and untold amounts of commerce go through each day.

    So what?

    Great argument.
     
  8. RedSmithClone

    RedSmithClone Active Member

    Thanks. I thought so too.
     
  9. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I'm not espousing a system. I'm merely saying that this country wasn't founded with a particular economic system as an impetus. There were much more important issues that it was built upon.
     
  10. the_lorax

    the_lorax Member

    I've never understood the argument that Clinton made the economy great. It was on the upswing when he came into office and it just kept going. Politicians' economic policies don't normally have an immediate effect — take the upcoming "economic stimulus package." Think they'll pour a bunch of money back out to us in May and then by June, everything will be just dandy? It's gonna take a while. And I'm sure that when your avatar is elected in November, you'll be happy to take credit for it.
    I also don't understand the argument that dems not spending money on Iraq would help the economy. If they weren't spending it there, they'd sure as hell be spending it somewhere else. They're Democrats. And I'm not going to say I don't support any of those domestic programs, because I do. I'm no hard-core conservative, but don't piss on my face and tell me it's raining.
     
  11. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I'd rather the government spend money on helping the less fortunate than to spend it on further pissing away lives and money on the continued destabilization of a country that was effectively neutralized, just not with the leader we would have liked. Heck, I would support close to this level of military spending, if we were to spend it on getting the actual person responsible for the 9/11 deaths, as opposed to taking out a leader who was a sworn enemy of our enemy.
     
  12. the_lorax

    the_lorax Member

    Not trying to defend the war. I wasn't in favor of it in the first place. But speaking of helping the less fortunate, don't we have an obligation to see the thing through? I mean, are we just going to yank out after going in there and fucking things up for the past five years?
    Nah. I think helping out deadbeats who can't hold down a job is a much better way to help the less fortunate.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page