1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Let's keep the Whitlock Love Fest going ... His T.O. column is terrific

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by wisportswriter, Sep 28, 2006.

  1. I just read it on the Knight Ridder McClatchy wire. Perchance someone can provide a KC Star link when it goes online Thursday morning.

    Anyway, good stuff.
  2. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    Why couldn't you cut-and-paste it here?
  3. Montezuma's Revenge

    Montezuma's Revenge Active Member

    This is past pathetic. Please, get a life.
  4. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Really. "Let's Keep The Whitlock Lovefest Going"? For god's sake, censor yourself.
  5. DyePack

    DyePack New Member

    He doesn't have a free hand.
  6. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

  7. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    I mean for god's sake, there are columnists and writers well up the food chain from Whitlock who post here under pseudonyms. Maybe there should be a Whitlock thread that we can confine the slurping to. Tho his top 25 voting should be a separate thread, because it does generate good debate.
  8. 21

    21 Well-Known Member

    Seriously....what kind of schmuck would post a sports column...by a sports columnist....on a sports journalism website....and have the audacity to say it was good.

    Shoulda posted about George Bush's underwear or what got stuck in your teeth at dinner tonight. At the very least, tell them the column sucked.
  9. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Cos gosh knows we never give Whitlock feedback here. ::)

    For god's sake, there are tons more columnists doing good and bad work. Why don't we talk about them, instead of documenting every movement Whitlock makes, as if we're stalkers or something?
  10. pallister

    pallister Guest

    Judging from post counts, there are a few stalkers around here.
  11. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Borrowing his smiley. It seems appropriate. What part of my post do you not agree with?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page