1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Lorenzo Neal a HoF'er?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Write-brained, Jan 11, 2009.

  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Because it cheapens the honor for those who are truly worthy. If Lorenzo Neal or Edgerrin James is a Hall of Famer, where do you put Joe Montana, Walter Payton and Jerry Rice? In their own "Super Hall of Fame" wing?
     
  2. micke77

    micke77 Member

    sometimes i think all Hall of Fames are becoming like the bowl system....too many get in. it just seems it's not as much exclusivity as it should be for a sport's highest honor.
     
  3. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    There is a huge gap between Edgerrin James and Lorenzo Neal. Your argument might hold up better if you took that into account.
     
  4. SnoopyBoy

    SnoopyBoy Member

    Different sport, but Rickey Henderson and Goose Gossage, each made the HOF after playing for 9 teams.
     
  5. zagoshe

    zagoshe Well-Known Member

    Translation -- "Neither can hold a candle to Erric Pegram and John L. Williams......"
     
  6. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    OK, I think you've made your point with that cute little twist.
     
  7. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Let's take Zag's stalkerish foolishness (Pegram? Seriously?) and turn it into something useful for the thread.

    If you are going to consider Neal, what do you do with somebody like John L. Williams? Williams was a good blocker, though not as good as Neal, and had a shorter career, but he was much more productive, especially during his time with the Seahawks.

    Williams ran for 5,006 yards in his career, going over 700 three times (1988, '91 and '92). His best season was 1988, when he had 877 yards rushing and caught 58 passes for 651 more. He finished his career with 546 receptions. He played at a time when the fullbacks were going from legitimate rushing threats to guards in the backfield, but he was capable of things that Neal has never been able to do. Williams was even a third-down back at times in his career, while Neal has always had to come out in passing situations.

    So, who has the better case? I don't think either guy belongs, but it might be instructive to look at players like Williams, who could do more than just block, before you strongly consider a guy like Neal.
     
  8. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    And Larry Centers was a fullback, too, right?
     
  9. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    You are correct, sir!
     
  10. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Correct, and he finished his career with 827 receptions, including 101 in 1995, though he wasn't much of a runner and he was not close to Neal's class as a blocker.
     
  11. zagoshe

    zagoshe Well-Known Member

    John L. Williams and Larry Centers belong before Lorenzo Neal does -- and neither of those two belong.
     
  12. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    All depends on what you like in a fullback. Some might like Centers' receptions; others might like Neal's blocking. And then there are guys like Tony Richardson, who some stated in recent years as the best fullback in the game.

    Bottom line, no fullback will make it in.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page