1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Google employee now free to work for Cleveland Plain-Dealer

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by RickStain, Aug 8, 2017.

  1. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    This has caused quite the kerfuffle online:

    Google Fires Engineer Who Wrote Memo Questioning Women in Tech

    Short version: Man posts 10-page paper discussing diversity in tech on Google's internal networks. Depending on who you ask, he may have been valiantly defending the science of biological differences between sexes to try to show better ways Google could implement diversity. Or he might have been championing outdated phrenology-level evo-psych as a thin fig leaf for his "women aren't as good at this stuff and shouldn't be here" mythology.

    Either way, he gone.
     
  2. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Give the actual document a read and tell me what you think.
     
  4. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Meaning is contextual
     
  5. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    I think he was arguing that robots are bad and a threat to our future prosperity. I could be wrong, but how would anyone know?
     
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member


    You have to find your own truth.
     
  7. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    The headline ... "Blah Blah Blah Questioning Women in Tech" ... is just too perfect. Really, all we need is a Lena Dunham tweet for the po-mo types to go all-in.
     
  8. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I'm not sure he's good enough for the Plain Dealer.
     
  9. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Regardless of the moral implications, his science is bad.
     
  10. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Would pay all the moneys for a robot president right about now.
     
    Johnny Dangerously likes this.
  11. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    I've still never in my life seen anyone but conservative men reference Lena Dunham
     
    Johnny Dangerously likes this.
  12. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    What science?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page