1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gonna

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Idaho, Jan 25, 2007.

  1. Crimson Tide

    Crimson Tide Member

    If an interview says "gonna," then I write "gonna." I try to be as authentic as I can with quotes, like, you know, within reason. </sarcasm>

    However, I try not to do write it if it's just my prose. I use "will" since "going to" is just a phrase which stretches out the same intention. Unless actual traveling is implied, and then I will write "going to" and have some kind of destination in the sentence.

    "They are going to change the lineup for tonight's game." is the same as "They will change the lineup for tonight's game."

    But "They are going to the state tournament." is different.
     
  2. Most of the guys and gals I cover don't worry too much about using the King's English so I get a steady diet of gonnas.

    I was quoting them as is until I was told to cease and desist.
     
  3. Dale Cooper

    Dale Cooper Member

    Changing it to "going to" I understand, but at what point is it condescending to change someone's speech?
     
  4. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    We are not going to take it.
    No, we are not going to take it.
    We are not going to take it.
    Any more.
    [/deesnider]
     
  5. Kato

    Kato Well-Known Member

    My wife, a freelance writer and a damn good editor, and I have a running debate about the use of "gotta." I use it; she usually changes it. My argument is, if you change it, then "got to" usually looks like someone's butchering the language. And, if you change it to "have to," then you're just changing the quote.
     
  6. HeinekenMan

    HeinekenMan Active Member

    Always change it. I once heard a coach say: "I'm gonna kick your ass." I changed it to proper English: "I am going to kick your donkey." There is no place for slang in newspapers. Leave that to the television world. They throw all kinds of poor grammar out there, and we know the result. Nobody watches TV these days.
     
  7. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    As with most of these arguments, context is key.

    If coach says, "We're gonna need a good effort Saturday night," I'd change it to going to.

    If coach says, "We gonna need our peckers hard to have a shot in hell against that bunch," I'm sticking with gonna.

    If there is an edifying reason for vernacular in quotes, g'head.

    If not, clean it up.
     
  8. RedCanuck

    RedCanuck Active Member

    I'm gonna, err going to, agree with Zeke. If it's color, that's alright. If it doesn't lose any effect, then I don't mind seeing it changed.
     
  9. Montezuma's Revenge

    Montezuma's Revenge Active Member

    Well-put, Zeke.
     
  10. Idaho

    Idaho Active Member

    Thank you.

    The coach I see quoted with gonna a lot says stuff like "We're gonna hafta play better defense if we expect to win."
    I see it and cringe. Because I know, that although he's just speaking quickly and in his own style, what he is saying is "We're going to have to play better defense ..."

    So, yes. I an see letting the colorful whimsical quotes retain the flavor. But the 'fixing' sentences which are just ordinary run of the mill statements don't necessarily smack me of changing the quote.

    Thanks for the input, folks.
     
  11. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Any time, Ides.

    You and me, we're of one mind.

    Scary, eh?
     
  12. HeinekenMan

    HeinekenMan Active Member

    Zeke is dead-on. An even better way to avoid some of this might be to paraphrase. If there's no color, you can probably summarize in less words what the coach said.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page