Dumb quark question

NewsEdit Pro here as well.

 

Got you guys beat.

I've got ID CS3 on my machine, as do all of the designers. We're running ID version 2.02. Not CS2. But 2.02.

Oh, and I fucking love NewsEdit. Much better than DTI.

 

I'd still take that over Quark 4.1. At least you're not dealing with all the system crashes that come with running OS9 in an OSX environment.

 

the desk folks don't use quick keys at your shop? they must be a bunch of fucking idiots.


edit: gomer, you are a gomer.

 

Please tell me you're typing in blue font. Indesign CS2 or CS3 is as good, if not better than any version of Quark, depending on who you ask.

 

you can count how many months it's been since you graduated college, can't you?

 

Yeah. Off the top of my head, 96.

You're entitled to your opinion but you come off as a jackass with comments like that.

 

and you love indesign. only people i've ever heard preach the love of ID, are new grads and, well, gomers.

 

I like them both. I probably prefer ID right now, but that's because it's been a while since I used Quark.

Though, isn't saying something like "everyone who likes ______ is of ______ demographic" kind of, ohgoshidon'tknow, a bit silly?

 

rosen - reread my last post. not what i said.

 

You implied that anyone who uses Indesign is an idiot. I think you were pretty clear on that.

For the record, I never said I loved Indesign. I simply pointed out that, depending on who you ask, Indesign's latest versions are better than Quark. I've talked to some who like it better, some who don't.

I don't have enough experience with Indesign to say whether it is better on a regular desking environment, but I do think it's better for feature layout due to its seamless integration with Illustrator and Photoshop.

But feel free to continue calling people names anyhow. It seems to be your shtick.

 

jesus christ, gomer, it's schtick. and take just a minute out of your fucking day to read post no. 19.