1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Both Obama & Clinton want to renegotiate NAFTA. Why?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by JR, Feb 27, 2008.

  1. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    jr jr, the Energy Czar
    You need his permission to drive your car.
    Before you go fill up with gas
    His Excellency requests that you kiss his ass.
    But while he worries about American law,
    the baby seals are being beaten raw.
    Gas prices have made him nervous and mean,
    Good luck, jr, and God save the queen.
     
  2. This is your argument?
    1) You'll get me at recess.
    2) Most evidence -- most especially that of which you decline to cite even the smallest part-- proves me wrong. But you're too busy right now to make that historical case, so you'll just assert something based on magic words and be on your way.
    3) Your complete laissez-faire utopia has never been tried, so we don't know if it would work, but if we ever did try it, it would work, so there.
    4) JR's experience as a Canadian remains less relevant to the discussion than are your card-trading days in junior high, but he's the condescending one.

    Impressive.
    Play-Doh or Silly Putty?
     
  3. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Ragu,

    You truly are a piece of work, pounding away on your keyboard about halfbaked ideas you seem to have picked up at an economics night course at your local library.

    Your statement that NAFTA is a "2,000 page document that promises to eliminate hundreds of tariffs and trade barriers--most of which the document itself created" only proves that you are a know-nothing charlatan. I mean, seriously, that is one of the stupidest fucking things I've heard about NAFTA--and I've heard most of them

    Let me repeat this-- because you're clearly dimwitted--you don't have a clue what you're talking about when it comes to the treaty. But you've proven that previously on healthcare, labour unions, Wal-Mart and newspapers so no one should be surprised about this most recent round of intellectual smoke and mirrors.

    I dont give a shit whether you read the document, familiarize yourself with the rules of origin, dispute resolutions, anti-dumping legislation, regional value content or the energy measures. Just don't drone on and on about something that you are completely ignorant of, OK?

    Your blythe statement that NAFTA is "unnecessarily complicated and perpetuates restrictions and nonsensical rules that ultimately hurt people economically" only shows that you probably don't have the intellectual capacity to understand a car lease.

    And to set the record straight: I represent hundreds of companies who import under the rules of NAFTA every day so, yes, I in fact do know what I'm talking about.

    BTW, the topic was not what Mr. Rand thought about free trade--it was the political posturing by HRC and Obama that they were going to renegotiate it. Try and stay with the tour, bud.
     
  4. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Those damn Invisible Handcuffs are mucking up free, unfettered trade. Things just haven't been the same on this contintent since the mid-1600s when Wampum fell sharply against the pound.
     
  5. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Cran,
    I have five beaver pelts. Wanna trade?

    That birchbark canoe and your Cal Ripken rookie card should do.

    And we don't need a treaty!
     
  6. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    I'll check with my lawyer. He may have some concerns and advise that some safeguards be negotiated into the agreement.
     
  7. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    My canoe is open for inspection and I have a certificate of authenticity for the Ripken card.

    I also have some nice land in Florida for sale
     
  8. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    OK we can make the exchange in the middle of Lake Memphremagog. But I can't be held liable if my canoe tips and the Ripken card gets wet.
     
  9. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    Your future transactions in the birchbark canoe/baseball card mercantile will go more smoothly if you first convert your wampum to guilders. Then, at the ComEx, hedge the guilders against birch futures. Buy on margin. Take the guilders remaining, convert them to doubloons, zlotys and kopeks, and head for the trading floor of the North American Bubble Gum Exchange. The markets in Eastern Europe and on pirate ships is very soft right now, even if the gum itself is not. Spread your investment capital across the entire range of bubble funds - stick, shredded, Dubble and Bazooka. Now you've hedged against a wet Ripken, ruined in a canoe blowdown.

    It's a win, win, win for all markets right down the line.
     
  10. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Awesome. I'll tell the Abnaki they can re-invest their earnings in casinos on sacred tribal land ... or some barren reservation.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Fenian, I'm not making an argument. Mr. Anger Management School Drop Out got personal. I was responding to it. That's not an argument. It's getting annoyed at the guy telling you how smart he is and how below his league you are.

    The only possible source of disagreement between two people on here was settled between you and me with one post each. I believe that unfettered trade benefits trading partners. You believe that unfettered trade leads to a host of evils, including systematic worldwide poverty, and we need rules and regulations to protect people.

    As much as you love to turn every disagreement into a "you are a wingnut," quip that's supposed to settle your righteousness, I am certain you realize that I didn't post anything not being taught to 18-year-old macroeconomics students every day. Comparative advantage is not some fringe idea. I assumed it was why you showed more restraint than you often do, even if we disagree (surprise).

    I've heard what you posted before. I am not sure if you also believe that protectionism and trade restrictions also somehow benefits countries economically, but if you do, you wouldn't be alone in your ideas--as much as I strongly disagree.

    My response was "agree to disagree." We'll never have the same world view. I've never thought that makes you stupid, which is why I try not to call you a foof or tell you to play with play-doh when I respond to you... I typically wait for you to go down that path before losing it, which you often do.

    We each somehow managed to make our views clear, and keep it to a simple disagreement about whether free trade is a good or bad thing, without the "idiocy" and "out of your league" bullshit and the all-or-nothing, "you are wrong about everything" statements. Why is that so bad?
     
  12. "A host of evils"?

    Geez, before the parade of Big Old Strawmen arrived, this thread actually was funny.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page