1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Billy Wagner HOF?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Ilmago, Oct 16, 2010.

  1. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Fine, but no one is addressing my points then on the game changing. Because, as I've previously stated, there's no way any starter from this era should make the hall based on what starters of previous eras did.

    And do you really want a Hall of Fame with no more pitchers? Might as well change the name to the Batting Hall of Fame, not the Baseball Hall of Fame.
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I don't think we're able to fully grasp how different it will be for pitchers 10 years from now because we still have to induct Maddux, Clemens, Glavine, Randy Johnson and I'm sure I'm forgetting some who were able to reach the HOF benchmarks (300 wins). Assuming Schilling and Smoltz get in (I say they do) it will be interesting to see how pitchers like Pedro Martinez and Johan Santana, who will likely never get close to 300, will be treated by voters.
     
  3. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    If Pedro Martinez doesn't get in, close the doors and forget about it.
     
  4. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    OK, there are times I agree 100% with OOP.
     
  5. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    So you do care? Because if you could care less, that means you care some, right??
     
  6. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Pedro will get in, even though he'll never touch 300.
     
  7. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Pedro has to be in.

    Guys with 275 wins but no Cys will be the bigger debate.
     
  8. shockey

    shockey Active Member

    has this link really degenerated to the point we're actually debating whether PEDRO MARTINEZ is head to the hall of fame? REALLY?

    check, please! :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
     
  9. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    Wagner is/was a very good closer but that's it. He's not memorable, never utterly dominated. Yes he was a lefty who threw nearly 100 and struck guys out but when was he ever considered the best? Did he ever really dominate for a couple of years? Not that I can recall. He's a Richard Dotson/Jim Kaat, really good pitcher with some longevity (read yesterday that Oscar Gamble played for 17 years, amazing). He's not an HOF'er to me.
     
  10. dreunc1542

    dreunc1542 Active Member

    I love when Mizzou brings up randomly dumb points (like the idea that Pedro might not get in) and then people jump on how stupid said point is and then he instantly backs off and agrees that his point was wrong. It happens like three times per thread on these HOF threads.
     
  11. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    How many starting pitchers with less than 220 wins are in the HOF? It's a short list.
     
  12. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I'd like to know where I said Pedro wouldn't get in. I said it will be interesting to see who gets in now that they're not hitting the 300 win marker. Pedro is a lock and has always been a lock. If he retires today, he cruises into Cooperstown on the first ballot.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page