1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bailout/rescue 2.0 passes both houses; Bush signs it. They hurry if they have to

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Oct 1, 2008.

  1. Hammer Pants

    Hammer Pants Active Member

    Choosing the lesser of two evils fucking sucks, but it's not the first time and won't be the last.
     
  2. nmmetsfan

    nmmetsfan Active Member

    Bottom line is major reform is necessary, both economically and in congress. Until enough people get on that boat its business as usual.
     
  3. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Re: Bailout/rescue 2.0 passes both houses; Bush signs it. They hurry if they hav

    I think we can all agree on that.

    Problem is, now is not the time to take that stand. You don't fix the boat when you're drowning. You have to get back into the boat first and get to shore first. Then, you can work on fixing it.
     
  4. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Re: Bailout/rescue 2.0 passes both houses; Bush signs it. They hurry if they hav

    And sometimes you have to get out the bucket and start bailing just to make it to shore ... else you find yourself rowing a submarine. :)
     
  5. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    More importantly, this money, hopefully, will jump start the credit market. As is, businesses large and small were finding they couldn't get loans even if they had perfect credit histories. So if an otherwise healthy company needed a loan to keep it afloat for even an insanely short period, it couldn't get it. So a company that shouldn't fail would. And it would cost people jobs and invested money and that would make the problem snowball.
    I'm sure that's dumbing it down a bit, but still that's the basic problem as I understand it. And unless everyone was going to get together, combine their $2,000 and start loaning it out, giving that money to the American people wouldn't really solve the problem.
     
  6. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/10/02/everything-you-want-to-know-about-the-700-billion-.aspx
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page