Are we in the new '60s?

You undermine your credibility when you toss out barbs like your last sentence. Impossible to have civilized discourse with you.

 

first of all, the Democrats did lose seats in the 1942 midterm elections and held a narrow majority. I know you wouldn't know this, yawn, because it might involve reading a book or something other than the right-wing, hate-radio crap that you serve up second-hand here.

second, I'd suggest you conduct yourself with a little bit of intelligence and integrity before you talk about morality, you toothless troll.

 

And ruin the plumbing? I don't think so.

 

Conservatives have cornered the market on morality, eh, Sleepyhead?

I bet a little evangelical reacharound could get you to change your mind.

 

Right. Ace. About 99 percent of evangelicals aren't closet homos like Haggard was. Hell, you guys ought to be welcoming him with open arms.

 

I thought you said that was for "medicinal purposes?"

 

Some churchgoers are liberal, Sleepyhead. Some churches, in fact, are liberal denominations.

Just so you know.

 

I go at least once a week. Course Yawn probably doesn't consider my kind to be Christian, given that Quakers have vastly different beliefs from evangelicals.

 

Oh, right. Quakers are known terrorists. As you seemed to suggest the Bush Administration regards you as.

Of course, the liberals bitched when we tried to selectively take aim at Muslim Extremist males between the ages of 18 and 40.

Quakers. Seems like Nixon was one of those. But I could guess how you feel about Nixon.

 

Why don't you guess? I'm sure you'll be completely wrong.

 

What is "take aim" a euphemism for, Sleepyhead?

 

Ace: You figure it out.


Sportschick: Duck and weave, gal. I'm sure whatever form I answered in, it would be wrong. Duck and weave.