Appleton columnist arrested

Sad and stunning.

http://www.postcrescent.com/article/20090812/APC0101/908120555/1003/APC01/Post-Crescent-sports-columnist-Mike-Woods-faces-charges-after-altercation

 

since the altercation happened at a Target, wouldn't they have shit on video? Just asking since the story has a "he said, she said" feel to it.

 

Cretin.

 

good lovin' gone bad

 

Was it the right move by the paper to put the columnist's name in the headline, or would a line somewhere in the story have been enough? "Woods, who was arrested at his home, is a sports columnist at the Post-Crescent. Something like that.

Of course, a few astute readers might accuse the paper of hiding the story, which is never good. But still, I would have hesitated to put his name and position in the headline. But maybe I'm way off on this one. What's the SOP for something like this?

 

"spitting in her face" ??

 

I'll bet if you asked 100 different papers whether they would run this story about a columnist, not a regular writer or editor, you would get about 50 yes answers and 50 no answers.

I worked at one paper where the columnist was arrested for being drunk in public or some variation of that about once a month and they never made the paper. Granted, that's not as bad as possibly assaulting someone and spitting in their face, but this was someone who was the face of the paper.

Granted, that was about a decade ago, a lot has changed these days with the Internet.

 

The thing is - I doubt the story makes the paper if one of their people isn't involved. Give credit to the paper for being transparent. Though the case sounds a little bogus to me. Don't know if it's the "following her to the Target" part or the spitting in her face part - who knows the guy just might be a Niedermeyer.