1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

All-purpose hockey thread...

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by hockeybeat, Nov 2, 2005.

?

How do you like the new NHL, compared to what the sport used to be?

  1. I love it!

    39 vote(s)
    38.6%
  2. I hate it!

    4 vote(s)
    4.0%
  3. I could not care less!

    11 vote(s)
    10.9%
  4. They're playing hockey? When did this happen?

    10 vote(s)
    9.9%
  5. I don't like hockey, but I love the fights.

    2 vote(s)
    2.0%
  6. Is Wayne Gretzky still playing?

    1 vote(s)
    1.0%
  7. Is Sidney Crosby a girl?

    5 vote(s)
    5.0%
  8. I like what I've seen so far but I'm not sure if I love it yet

    29 vote(s)
    28.7%
  1. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    The following post is not hyperbole: Jaromir Jagr will score 100 goals this season.
     
  2. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    He has the ability, but will he give a damn long enough to do this? No one doubts Jagr's offensive abilities, but the guy's almost a living heart donor ...
     
  3. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Wouldn't he need a heart in the first place?
     
  4. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    I saw the Rangers-Devils game tonight, and he had more room to dangle than he's had in years. He finished with two goals--he leads the league with 14 goals--and three points.
     
  5. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Room to dangle? I'm sorry, I'm not gonna watch the game that closely.
     
  6. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Oh yeah. tells you how closely I follow the Eastern Conference. After all, i only need to know one Eastern Conference team, whichever one the Wings beat in the Cup Finals. ;D
     
  7. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    Look, it's not what BYH attempts to do for eight seconds with his better half...I'm just saying Jagr has more room to stick handle...shit, that didn't make it any better.  :-[
     
  8. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    And that would be when, exactly?
     
  9. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

     
  10. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    This is an example of how inept the Islanders are.

    Early in the season, a forward crashed into DiPetro, driving his knee into the Islanders' goalie's head. He leaves the game with a concussion.

    Instead of having him rest and recover, Scotty Sterling and Mike Milbury have him practice the next day. During a scrimmage, two Islanders collide with each other and fall onto DiPetro, triggering another concussion.

    Islanders Hockey: We'll knock you out...or end our goaltender's career, trying!  :D ;D ;D :D
     
  11. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    When did Detroit--or Colorado--join the Eastern Conference?

    Oh, how are the Blues doing? :D ;D
     
  12. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Re: New NHL vs. the old NHL

    The Blues suck donkey dick. Next question.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page