1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Alex Rodriguez: Hall of Famer?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Jul 23, 2013.

  1. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    There were plenty of people who were happy to go along without questioning with Braun, too, though it was closer to being balanced, perhaps because there was no evidence of PED use before the suspension that was eventually overturned. We already knew Rodriguez had used because he admitted it.
     
  2. Gold

    Gold Active Member

    Madden's claim is absurd. It is illogical that you could get three-steps for one time being caught using a PED. The way the provisions work is that a player gets suspended the first time for 50 games. Here's another problem with that pretzel logic - Manny Ramirez was caught a second time, and baseball decided not to punish him because he "retired". How could Selig justify a lifetime ban for A-Rod if he didn't follow through with Ramirez?

    If baseball has evidence that A-Rod distributed steroids, it should turn that over to police and let the legal system handle this. If they had this evidence earlier, they should have suspended him in May or June. It seems awfully strange to wait until A-Rod is ready to play to make plans for the suspension.
     
  3. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    I thought that the progressive penalty was predicated on a prior penalty, not # of times caught. In order to receive a 100 game suspension you would have to have already served a 50 game suspension.
     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    That was my understanding as well, but I wouldn't be shocked to see MLB try to bend the rules or even circumvent its own policies in these cases. They have public opinion on their side an the MLBPA seems more than happy to turn on players facing charges of PED use.
     
  5. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    That was what I thought, but Madden described it differently today on the Boomer and Carton show. Basically saying that A-Rod is facing three "counts" of PED violations. Craig Carton questioned him on it, asking if that's the case, then why would Selig introduce the "best interest" clause, rather than just using the collectively-bargained PED punishments. Madden said Selig may go that route to avoid the inevitable appeal because he doesn't want to see A-Rod on the field, as a symbol of the Biogenesis scandal, while everyone else has accepted their punishments.
     
  6. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Having read a little more about this over the last few days, I think Selig could justify the longer ban based on A-Rod getting in the way of MLB's investigation.

    There's part of me that just wonders how much the Yankees are encouraging Selig to make the suspension longer.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page