1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A ruling in favor of a great website

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by EStreetJoe, Feb 12, 2009.

  1. EStreetJoe

    EStreetJoe Well-Known Member

    Three women sued the book put out by the owners of a website claiming defamation of character.
    The NJ Supreme Court just ruled yesterday that the women lose their case as the photos are protected by the first amendment.
    The website is SFW (unless some pictures of women in bikinis are NSFW)
    http://www.hotchickswithdouchebags.com/
     
  2. JR

    JR Active Member

    This is my favourite duo although I'd be more inclined to call is loser douchebag with skanky white chick

    [​IMG]

    Poor parents.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Some judge really wrote this:

     
  4. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    The case should have been denied when filed.
     
  5. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    That board has the best name ever: Waiting for Godouche.
     
  6. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    At least it won't be difficult to locate in the future. Just put "douchescrote" in the FindLaw search function and you probably won't get more than a few dozen responses from which to choose.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page