The question wasn't whether or not SAS could adequately conduct a television interview. The point is that the people who enjoy his work tuned in expecting something different, and the people who despise his work were never going to give him credit for presenting a show that they otherwise might admire.
That's where ESPN whiffed with this show.
As for the person who suggests "angry minority" is too prevalent on TV, are you saying you're cool with angry white guys? Cause there sure are a lot of them on the tube, and we don't hear you complaining.
That's where ESPN whiffed with this show.
As for the person who suggests "angry minority" is too prevalent on TV, are you saying you're cool with angry white guys? Cause there sure are a lot of them on the tube, and we don't hear you complaining.