1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your Hall of Fame Vote, Post-Mitchell

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 21, Dec 13, 2007.

  1. Hammer Pants

    Hammer Pants Active Member

  2. HoopsMcCann

    HoopsMcCann Active Member

    if he were good enough, sure. but he wasn't. next.
  3. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    My acid test (and many others) would be this ... to what degree did steroids make them a HOFer?

    If, in the case of Bonds and Clemens, there's a clear delineation between roid and pre-roid use, and a HOF case could be made for the pre-roid era, I'd deny them their first-ballot shot as a protest because of its symbolic value, but probably eventually vote them in.

    If, in the case of McGwire or Sosa (not named, but widely suspected), a HOF case would be difficult to make taking into account their roid use, they don't get a vote.

    That's how I'd do it.
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I can see the argument for banning anybody who failed a test, though I'm not sure if I agree or not.

    But being named in this report is not enough. For some of the people listed, the evidence just isn't solid enough.
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I think the voters will take care of this in their own way. Maybe by not voting those named in the report in their first or second years of eligibility. It's a very murky question.
  6. SoCalDude

    SoCalDude Active Member

    The confirmed abusers, don't make them eligible for 15 years, instead of 5. That extra 10-year span will be an agonizing punishment for them. If they are still alive after 15 years, then let them be on the ballot. If they're not alive, well, then who cares.
  7. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Bonds and Clemens belong in the Hall, no questions.
  8. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    Kurkjian just made a good point on ESPN --- days like this are why the 5-year waiting period exists. We'll probably know a lot more about Bonds and/or Clemens and their involvement with steroids, one way or the other, in five years than we know now.
  9. budcrew08

    budcrew08 Active Member

    If Dale Murphy were getting any, Jim Rice better be on that list for guys who should get into the HOF now.
  10. BYH

    BYH Active Member

  11. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    Does Rice really get no love because he's considered good-but-not-good-enough or because he's a horse's ass?
  12. EStreetJoe

    EStreetJoe Well-Known Member

    keep the steroids/HGH users out. They were legal in baseball, but illegal in general society. That makes the users of those substances of poor character. If I'm not mistaken good character is one of the criteria for the Hall.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page