1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

You Know Things are Bad When the LAT Sells an A-1 Ad -- and Not a Wrap

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by WriteThinking, Apr 9, 2009.

  1. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    And 150 years ago, there were tons of ads on page one, and ALL of them looked like editorial content. They were distinguished mostly by having the notation "--Adv." at the end.

    Ad revenue keeps journalists employed and their children fed.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Because they aren't remotely the same thing, technologically speaking.

    Why don't newspapers have to pay ISPs to deliver their web sites to homes, the same way you have to pay a shipping company to deliver products shipped to customers via mail?
     
  3. fishwrapper

    fishwrapper Active Member

    I said journalism. You say newspapers.
    I'm differentiating the two. My original post:

    As to the salient point made by Buck: The problem: charging per usage by each website for disseminated information is a different beast than a video feed acquired by a cable or satellite provider. The monitoring is an algorithm or all algorithms.
     
  4. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page