1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why no moral outrage from Jesse and Al?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by heyabbott, Apr 28, 2007.

  1. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Nobody is saying that.

    But the crime in question is not about race.

    And neither is your reverse hypothetical.

    I'm sure in America today there will be lots of black people victimized by white criminals. It'll happen tomorrow, too. And the next day . . .

    And the Revs. won't say anything about any of those, either.

    Try to keep up.
     
  2. boots

    boots New Member

    Are you referring to me?
     
  3. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    No. Yawn.
     
  4. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Not everything's about you, Boots ::) ::) ::) ::)
     
  5. boots

    boots New Member

    You want people to know you are on here. OK we know you are here. Do you have something to contributer to the topic? I guess the answer is no.
    There was no need for your remark. You could PM that or something. You used to show some class on the boards. Please do so now by sticking to the topic. Thank you.
     
  6. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Of course, you could have PM'd this, too, correct?
     
  7. boots

    boots New Member

    I could but I didn't take a shot at anyone and the reference was about the topic being discussed. Don't get it twisted like a pretzel Zeke. You like to play the good guy role when it suits you and then jab. It's not working this time. Stick to the topic.
     
  8. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Maybe I'm a good guy when it suits me.

    And you can eat my ass with a spoon, attention-whore.
     
  9. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    In that usage, Zeke, it wouldn't be hyphenated.

    boots is an attention whore.
    boots exhibits attention-whore tendencies.

    See the difference?
     
  10. boots

    boots New Member

    I don't need attention zeke. You have yet to realize that its idiots like you who bring attention to my posts. Everyone else either answers and keeps going. By now, you should've figure that out but I forgot, you're not as bright as you think you are.
    STICK TO THE TOPIC thank you.
     
  11. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    The topic is attention whores, boys and girls.
     
  12. boots

    boots New Member

    No, the topic is what the original post was sportschick. You want to threadjack, do it on random thoughts. Not here. People are tired of your schitck and shit. I'm trying to be kind here.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page