1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who do you feel worse for? The tiger or the 17 year-old?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by poindexter, Jan 4, 2008.

?

Who do you feel worse for?

  1. The Tiger

    75.4%
  2. The 17 year-old

    24.6%
  1. Frylock

    Frylock Member

    It takes a special degree of stupidity to be the ones who pissed off a tiger to such a degree that it actually tries (and succeeds) to attack from a zoo enclosure, too small or not.
    I'm just sayin.
     
  2. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Mark Geragos got me $900,000!
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/29/BAPS17T0BD.DTL&tsp=1
     
  3. Grimace

    Grimace Guest

    The idiot lottery pays off again.

    The only that stops me from being totally pissed off is the realization the money these guys are left with after lawyer fees will be gone in a year or two.

     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Fuck-ups all around, including the idiots running that zoo.
     
  5. U.Fester

    U.Fester New Member

    Tigers suck.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page