When you thought Ann Coulter couldn't get any crazier, here you go...

cyclingwriter · Nov 3, 2011

Beaker said:

Also, bringing up Democrats/Republicans of three or four generations ago is well, fairly irrelevant, I think. The composition of those parties bears little resemblance to the ones of today. It's much more relevant to discuss the political philosophies (i.e. liberal/conservative) that have been more constant. The name of a party is just that, a name.

Abraham Lincoln was a Radical Republican in his day, but what does that have to do with the modern Republican party? Absolutely nothing. It's overly simplistic, but over time, liberals moved from the Republicans to the Democrats and vice versa. So bringing up the fact that Strom Thurmond was a Republican or that Robert Byrd was a Democrat doesn't really mean much.
Click to expand...

That's logic. You have more than 7,000 posts. You should know that kind of stuff don't play around here by now.

GoochMan · Nov 3, 2011

I was SO hoping that no one would take the bait thrown out by that shrew Ann Coulter.

Killick · Nov 4, 2011

Still, nobody has said it better than Henry Rollins.

Log in or Sign up

When you thought Ann Coulter couldn't get any crazier, here you go...

cyclingwriter Active Member

GoochMan Active Member

Killick Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

When you thought Ann Coulter couldn't get any crazier, here you go...

cyclingwriter Active Member

GoochMan Active Member

Killick Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches