1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What's your Olympic coverage plan?

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by huntsie, Jul 31, 2008.

  1. Mystery_Meat

    Mystery_Meat Guest

    Gee, Mr. Tolerance, did you notice the example you cited. Monosyllabic tailbacks. Want to venture a guess as to what race produces the large majority of running backs at the pro, college and high school (outside heavily-white states) level?

    Get the plank out of your own eye before you start bugging about the splinter in someone else's.
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Are you a sports editor or ASE?

    I ask because I had almost the exact same opinion when I wasn't one. I'd roll my eyes when the boss would slap another State U practice story or high school feature on the front when I thought there were more compelling national stories.

    Then I moved into this chair. Reader feedback quickly changed my mind.
     
  3. albert77

    albert77 Well-Known Member

    We're a 20K daily in the Deep South with a D-1 program in town and a pro team in training camp just up the road. I can tell you flat-out, the Olympics will take a definite back seat to football – high school, college and pro – at our paper.

    We'll have a daily roundup and run selected agate on the Olympics. The sports that people here have some interest in: track, basketball, swimming and gymnastics, we'll give some extra play to. We'll probably run an occasional column (if space permits), and perhaps a truly compelling feature (again, if space permits).

    But we just don't have the newshole on a consistent basis or the reader interest to go hog-wild over the Olympics at the expense of the preseason football coverage our readers demand. And no amount of lecturing about what we "should be" giving our readers is going to change that.
     
  4. Rhody31

    Rhody31 Well-Known Member

    We're chain of weeklies. We have a local swimming two events. My paper doesn't have AP, so we only have file are our former photog took, and it is terrible.
    So we're pretty screwed - but I will, for the life of me, find a way to get at least two stories out of it and it will run huge.
    That said, anyone in Beijing covering swim wants to make some cash, please PM me. Be forewarned - we're cheap.
     
  5. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    I'm pretty sure this is what everyone on this thread is suggesting also. Cover football, present those "great" Olympics stories as warranted. Football, more often than not for a lot of papers, will just take precedence in terms of presentation.

    It sounds like we all agree. So I'm not sure what all the commotion is about.
     
  6. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Tone, sparrow. The commotion is about tone.
     
  7. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    I know that. I'm just not sure why the dude's getting his panties in a wad when we're all basically saying the same thing, apparently.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page