1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What music from today will stand the test of time?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Boobie Miles, Feb 11, 2007.

  1. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    The consumer market is much more splintered these days. The result is consensus and fewer mainstream, breakthrough great performers and musicians.
    The result is also more access to great performers and musicians who don't find breakthrough, mainstream success.
     
  2. pallister

    pallister Guest

    Maybe some of the older posters can help me out with this. Thinking about Cosmo bringing up Wilco, I was trying to think of a band that now, decades later, is still considered great and influential and whose music is still listened to by high school kids but was not in the elite category of their peers (at least as far as mainstream success, records sold, etc.) during their prime. I was thinking the Doors. From what I've read, they were popular to an extent, but not to the level of the Beatles, Stones, Zeppelin, etc. They were my favorite band as a kid because of my older brothers' influence and I still catch young kids listening to them today. Perhaps Wilco, despite not fitting the mainstream mold, is the the Doors of today -- an influential band that will actually grow in overall popularity through the years. Just a thought.
     
  3. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    No one has mentioned Tom Waits?
     
  4. pallister

    pallister Guest

    Seems like a good one. Although comparing Black Sabbath and Wilco, even in such a roundabout way, makes me laugh.
     
  5. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    And that reason is because Brian Wilson was no longer a part of the band. It was a collection of dipshits cashing checks by playing "Surfing USA."

    The "what did they do after 'Pet Sounds'?" argument is largely rendered moot by the fact that Brian was crazy and playing in a sandbox for most of the 70s and 80s.
     
  6. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Or maybe he'll design his name so that if you hold it up backwards, it spells DEVIL!!!!!
     
  7. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    I have to lash out at Hinder in this thread. Hinder wishes it could be half as good as Nickelback, which wishes it could be half as good as Kajagoogoo. Barf.
     
  8. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Which also proves that the "band" was nothing without its leader and creative force. It would be kinda like Denny Laine and some guys and a terrible female keyboardist/singer going on tour and calling themselves Wings -- who are you kidding and what's the point, other than soaking gullible fans?
     
  9. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Naw, I know Hinder sucks. I like 'em in spite of that.
     
  10. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Flag, I love you, buddy.
    But I can't sit here and read you bad-mouthing Kajagoogoo.
     
  11. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Just like all the bands we you loved in the '80s right? :D :D :D
     
  12. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Exactly. . . except for Def Leppard. Def Leppard was good, dammit!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page