1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

We have our first openly gay American active athlete

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Football_Bat, Apr 29, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    I meant that a gay couple cannot produce.
     
  2. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    They can produce. With each other? No.

    By giving their sperm to a woman to carry their baby? Yes.
     
  3. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    If God had intended that, he'd created them able to do it the natural way.
    And you just proved that a mother and father are necessary to make it happen.
    But then, people who politically label preborns as "fetal tissue" would simply see life as something you can buy like you would at a Walmart, or just discard if no longer needed.
     
  4. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Sperm and egg seems pretty natural to me.
     
  5. dog eat dog world

    dog eat dog world New Member

    Which are meant to raise a kid together, otherwise they'd both have option A or B, like a button push on the uterus.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page