1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

WashPost on Ralph Sampson

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by gravehunter, Jun 23, 2013.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    So that disproves my "not that many" statement? Because you watched? One person would definitely stay within the realm of "not that many."

    I would be shocked beyond belief if those games drew higher than a 1.5 rating. Compare it to the millions upon millions of people who watched Ewing and Shaq dozens of times over their years and at a time that the NCAA tournament was far more popular than it is now.
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I wonder if there will ever be another draft that produces four likely Hall-of-Famers in the first five picks.

    There were whispers before that draft that Carmelo was more NBA ready than James. I don't think they were suggesting that Carmelo should go No. 1, but just that Anthony might have more of an immediate impact.
     
  3. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    OK so we will be very generous and say that's 300,000 people who saw him live. And what they saw was him playing against other 16- to 18-year-olds. I'm sure he dominated.

    How many people do you think saw Shaq, Ewing, Olajuwon or Duncan play live before they were drafted?
     
  4. dreunc1542

    dreunc1542 Active Member

    I was going to add that he would have been seen by fewer than the number of people who watched Shaq and Ewing in college, but didn't think that was necessary. That still doesn't mean that "not that many" people, outside of scouts, saw him. Unless you're using "not that many" as a purposefully vague term that can mean as many as millions of people.
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Not that many as related to what would be required to create these "expectations." I think that's a plainly evident part of the discussion.
     
  6. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    That SI cover made the outlandishly hyped expectation that as a high school junior LeBron James is . . . an NBA lottery pick.

    Oooooooh, way out on a limb there.

    That's hardly the "Next Jordan!!!!" level of hype many attribute to him.
     
  7. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Olajuwon and Ewing played in three Final Fours.

    LeBron was far from unknown, but he wasn't the household name that Ewing or Olajuwon were... Granted, those days are mostly behind us. Was Duncan the last college senior to be taken No. 1 in the draft?
     
  8. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    My list was not about the general public's expectations. People who knew basketball said LeBron James would change the sport. And he did. His hype is second only to Lew Alcindor's.
     
  9. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Kenyon Martin BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
     
  10. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Magic

    Magic changed the way the guard position is played. And you could argue that Bird and Magic could each be on this list of most anticipated players.
     
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Holy shit. I would have bet just about anything Martin had come out early.
     
  12. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    I agree that I had Shaquille O'Neal too low. He probably should be second.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page