USA Today's Chris Chase: Post-game interviews worthless

I believe the hatred stems from his incompetence. Factual errors, spelling errors, grammatical errors, more factual errors, and a lack of comprehension on the subjects he reported upon. A hefty share of the comments below his submissions were corrections and people laughing at him. The hatred came across more in the vein of "How does this guy get paid to write sports?" He makes BR look good.
You have to remember these fans look at sports journalists as getting paid big bucks to have fun. The Yahoo! name, being one of the biggest websites, only enhances that thought to those who don't know better. They don't see him as just another blogger.

 

That's the first time an in-game interview delivered. Actually, the one with Barkley was funny, too, when Chuck asked one more than the allotted two questions.

 

I remember some of those now, but I need to start watching more Spurs games on TNT.

 

Am I being Punk'd or something?