1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Unemployment benefits story (sympathy or sob)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Stitch, Dec 1, 2010.

  1. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    The maximum federal unemployment tax that would be paid on behalf of any worker is $56 per year. State rates and maximums vary wildly. In Massachusetts it maxes out at 10.96% and isn't levied on wages in excess of $14,000. It's hard to get a feel for what might be the maximum absolute annual levies, but it's probably only a few hundred dollars at most.
     
  2. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    In Canada you max out at about 740 per year, thsi takes aprox 43 grand to do. Your weeks allowed are tied to the amount of hours you've worked in that year. Maternity allows the mother to be off a year.
     
  3. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    I believe any extensions are completely paid for by the federal government though.
     
  4. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    For those concerned about the amount of premiums paid in by any one employee:

    If your home burns down, do you believe that your benefit should max out at the amount of p & c premiums you've paid? Insurance 101: A lot of people pay in small amounts, so that those who incur the insured risk can receive a significant benefit.
     
  5. NoOneLikesUs

    NoOneLikesUs Active Member

    Let 'em cut the benefits. Just do it. Bring the pain to the surface. We're fucked up in our priorities as a nation, so we might as well just go full bore ahead and stop pretending.
     
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I was trying to point out that this is an insurance pool that we pay into -- not welfare.
     
  7. Bob Cook

    Bob Cook Active Member

    If it makes you feel any better, Junkie, a fair number of people who come to my church's homeless shelter have low-paying jobs.
     
  8. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    If it's just insurance, when do the rates go up to reflect the true risk?
     
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Everybody here knows that to collect "unemployment," you have to have lost a job, right?
     
  10. Shaggy

    Shaggy Guest

    Yeah, I really don't see how anyone could have a strong opinion here. I obviously don't want to see people using their unemployment check as a reason to not aggressively pursue work (my own dipshit cousin collected unemployment for 11 months, the first 9 of which she never bothered looking for a job. She called it "funemployment")

    At the same time, there aren't any jobs out there in a lot of sectors. I think those of us in newspapers can empathize with that, can't we?
     
  11. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Maybe if you went to the stores where people who make $20,000 a year can afford to purchase $72,0000 Escalades and $4,000 52-inch HDTVs, you could stretch your tax dollars further.
     
  12. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    No worries with you, Ace.

    Every time we discuss unemployment, some people have trouble with "insurance". Just like somebody can be counted on to yell "First Amendment!" when a private employer fires some dope who's shot off his mouth.

    Just feeling pet-peevish. ;)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page