1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Uh oh - more asterisks needs for MLB! Who told you so - lol? Mark = HOF

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by John D. Villarreal, Apr 28, 2007.

?

Now after all of the PED revelations how many feel Mark McGwire should be in the HOF?

  1. Yes, he was always a HOF'r

    7 vote(s)
    22.6%
  2. Yes, he has suffered enough vote him in

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Probably, most of MLB was using some PED

    4 vote(s)
    12.9%
  4. Maybe

    5 vote(s)
    16.1%
  5. No, I hate Mark

    15 vote(s)
    48.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    My favorite post of the day. Truly amazing.
     
  2. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    Not for a lack of trying on his part and mine.
     
  3. John D. Villarreal

    John D. Villarreal New Member

    BW, I said on-air personalities at ESPN
     
  4. John D. Villarreal

    John D. Villarreal New Member

    You mean like Gammons? LOL
     
  5. spnited

    spnited Active Member


    Gammons is listed you drug-addled fucking moron.
     
  6. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Headbutt, have ever told you how much I love you?

    Spnited, you too :-* :-* :-*
     
  7. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    I missed the where have I been comment, but my disdain for ESPN is a pretty established fact. And just because an ESPN talking head says something, doesn't mean the actual "experts" believe it.
     
  8. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

  9. John D. Villarreal

    John D. Villarreal New Member

    Oh agreed. I found it most amusing in it's hilarity and lack of substance & inability to address the salient points I put forward.

    Of course, it had to be sprinkled with the requisite personal attack and lack of professionalism (he is a moderator after all) topped of with a tinge of "internet tough- guy/but real-life wimp" syndrome (which of course we all know what the end result of that match up would be in a real-life friendly contest).

    Yes, I found it most amusing.

    Typically, when it gets to that it is a clear sign to me that my critics have nothing & I have won.

    Sorry, but I don't think it too much to ask that the moderators remain neutral and professional & not actively lobby for a perfectly legit thread to be "jacked" while heaping insults on posters - particularly while I am taking the high road & the usual suspects are not.

    JDV
     
  10. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    DD, that's my favorite T-shirt from bustedtees.
     
  11. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    to be fair, buck, the ones he names (Gammons, Starks) are on the five who voted yes. True, that's not "all the on-air personalities" but at least he blindly picked the right names.
     
  12. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Dammit, BuckW. Will you stop confusing the issue with FACTS!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page