UCLA student's anti-Asian rant

Did you listen to her talk?

 

Oh Pancamo, I think you know that isn't at all what I said but are just trying to pick a fight. If I'm wrong and you are actually that bad at reading, I suggest you sound it out. Really the only thing I am saying is that because she got into UCLA doesn't automatically mean she is part of the academic upper crust.

As to the question of whether she is stupid, as Ace noted, I will submit the video as Exhibit A.

 

You could walk around almost any dorm at any college and find a worse rant on almost any given night.

 

She's a college kid making a politically incorrect rant.

She's not making fun of the tsunami. She's not making light of a tragedy. She's pissed off about some people talking on the phone in the library and she made fun of how they talk.

I was expecting something much worse. On the racism scale of 1 to 10, that's about a 2.

 

She'll be on Faux Noise within a couple months.

The bouncing bazongas, the goggle-eyed hentai/manga/blowup-doll facial expressions -- she's got all the journalistic credentials to be the new Megyn Kelly.

 

I'd say it's more of a 5. But mostly she comes across as dolt.

 

A five without a racial slur?

 

What's more ignorant and offensive, this girl's ching chong rant or Adrian Peterson comparing the NFL negotiations to modern-day slavery?

 

Because this is narcissistic, exhibitionist, voyeurist America, where any attention is good attention, and attention is an end in itself.

edited: This is THAT side of America.

 

In this instance I'd say AD. So UCLA > OU (like that was ever in question.)

 

The stupid-ass "ching-chong-chung" thing is pretty damn close.

Let's give this little nothing her 15 minutes and then let her return to being a nothing.

 

Pretty big difference between making fun of how someone talks and a racial slur. I agree about letting her return to be a nothing. This 15 minutes of fame/infamy is very undeserved.