1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

the ultra-wealthy actually have an insufficient influence

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by YankeeFan, Mar 10, 2012.

  1. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Citadel CEO Ken Griffin:

    With the Citizen's United decision, and this kind of mind set among bankers/hedge fund managers, i don't think the Republican nominee (Romney) is going to have to worry about matching President Obama's spending.
  2. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    I imagine Mr. Griffin considers any influence less than 100% to be insufficient.
  3. Johnny Dangerously

    Johnny Dangerously Active Member

    "Insufficient" for whom? The ultra-wealthy? The good of the planet? Mr. Griffin?
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Active Member

    Another mimeographed handout from the Ministry of Truth.
  5. Point of Order

    Point of Order Active Member

    I was just thinking that.
  6. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  7. Azrael

    Azrael Active Member

    Aristocrats insufficiently aristocratic claims impoverished lunatic.
  8. Bubbler

    Bubbler Active Member

    So wealthy, so lacking self-awareness.
  9. Magic In The Night

    Magic In The Night Active Member

    Boy, the Kochs must be starting to worry. That whole birth control mess just might be a problem...
  10. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    One thing about the Kochs: Daddy's Money didn't buy brains.
  11. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Now there's a man willing to fight for the sacred principal of one dollar, one vote.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page