1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Sports Editor - Episode 1

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Inky_Wretch, Sep 30, 2008.

  1. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    T-U has always been an interesting place, lots of good people coming through, lots of obstacles to putting out a great section day in and day out.
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Will Gene Frenette be falling down the stairs of any press boxes in Episode 2?
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    What took you, Mizzou?
     
  4. silentbob

    silentbob Member

    As our industry crumbles, I wouldn't bash anyone for trying something different, silly or even stupid. Better than sitting around doing nothing.
     
  5. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    Why make yourself look stupid or silly on purpose?
     
  6. EE94

    EE94 Guest

    I appreciate what you were trying to do, but I think you missed an opportunity to show readers just what an SE actually does. By being goofball, you play to the sportswriter stereotype.

    Journalism is compelling. Just look at what MTV has done with a high school paper.

    I think an actual day in the life could be enlightening for readers - ie, hashing out storylines, slotting the paper.
     
  7. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Exactly. If you're going to do it, do it straight. Don't go goofy with it.
     
  8. silentbob

    silentbob Member

    Goofy is good.
    Yes, you can certainly overdo it, something Rick Reilly needs to be reminded of this very second, but way, way, way, way too many people in this business trip over their own seriousness. Loosen up.

    I havent seen the Jacksonville video. But I just assumed they were kind of going after the same vibe ESPN puts out with their commericals. Kind of a humerous, toungue-in-cheek look at what they do.

    Some of are you are proposing a more serious approach, which is fine. But I dont think allowing cameras into a budget meeting while I bunch of people discuss which sports story gets the biggest play makes for riveting television. You could argue that being goofy serves no purpose as well. I get that.

    But here, I would go goofy 9 times out of 10 and see where it takes me. And as I wrote in the previous post, given the state of the industry, I applaud these guys for having fun. My office these days is a morgue.
     
  9. Gomer

    Gomer Active Member

    Is it possible they did it as much for themselves as anything else? I can see how doing the skit would be good for morale.
     
  10. JHath

    JHath Member

    Silent Bob and Gomer, you're right. We wanted it to be more "Curb Your Enthusiasm" than "The Paper" because we felt that would draw the most viewers. Budget meetings and laying out the section are boring on video (heck, most times, they're boring in person), so we wanted to go another direction. And that direction is to have fun and see where this thing goes.

    As Gomer mentioned, the videos have been good for morale, which in times like this is refreshing. It has people in the department talking about other ideas for videos, and some will be more serious than others. But if we did an all-serious video, I don't think it would work so much.
     
  11. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Where's the part in the video where the guy posts on SportsJournalists.com?
     
  12. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    Most people on here know who I am, or at least know I once worked at the T-U, and it's weird seeing my old office on the video, I must admit. Kind of fun.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page