1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Jun 26, 2015.

  1. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Outing alert: Justice Scalia is Eric Cartman #askthenearesthippie
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2015
  2. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Polygamists also thank you.

     
  3. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    My wife and I have been shopping, but we can't decide which gender to add. Maybe both.

    Would certainly help with child care.
     
    exmediahack likes this.
  4. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

  5. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Bestiality is right after that, amirite?
     
  6. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Animals still have to sue to get that right. Good luck doing that without thumbs, bitches.
    Evolution FTW.
     
    SnarkShark likes this.
  7. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    I quit believing in the domino theory halfway through the Vietnam War.
     
    Double Down likes this.
  8. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

  9. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    You would think a friggin' Supreme Court justice would take the time to form a dissent that doesn't sound like a message board rant.

    #notthattheresanythingwrongwiththat
     
  10. qtlaw24

    qtlaw24 Active Member

    I'm glad the SCOTUS saw through the charade of "protection of the sanctity of traditional marriage".

    Its all about money; if you're married you get benefits that the unmarried get; so why should gays be discriminated against from receiving the same benefits?

    I applaud Kennedy for penning a great closing to the opinion.
     
    Ace likes this.
  11. franticscribe

    franticscribe Well-Known Member

  12. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page