1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Speaking of bad headlines ...

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by SF_Express, Dec 15, 2006.

  1. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

  2. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    I've had it happen.

    And that's all I'll say.
     
  3. dawgpounddiehard

    dawgpounddiehard Active Member

    Seeing that kind of made my stomach turn.
     
  4. BigRed

    BigRed Active Member

    That's bad, but this is one of my personal favorites.
    Let's just say it could have been written another way.....
    http://www.roanoke.com/business/wb/wb/xp-88553
     
  5. Chi City 81

    Chi City 81 Guest

    All I want to say is on the main page, the thread title is truncated.

    So what I saw was, "Speaking of bad head..."
     
  6. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    Well, you know what they say ...
     
  7. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    Anyone else notice that the header on the piece reads "The impotence of proofing"?

    I hope this was a little joke.....
     
  8. Lion_Woods

    Lion_Woods Active Member

    Yeah, that's the only reason I clicked on this thread
     
  9. imjustagirl2

    imjustagirl2 New Member

    Read all the way down to the bottom of the file.
     
  10. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    Thank god for that. The page wasn't loading up properly for me.
     
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I have seen so many mistakes that are about 1,000X worse than that one...
     
  12. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    People keep saying in that article that is was a proofing error at the Omaha paper.

    What is proofing? Do papers hire enough folks on the desk to actually proof pages on deadline?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page