1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

South Carolina cop charged with murder in shooting

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Apr 7, 2015.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    The earliest reports -- working off the officer's contention that Scott was trying to take his taser -- said that even after a taser is fired, it can be used as a stun gun to incapacitate someone. So I think that's going to be the basis of the defense: Scott grabbed for the taser, the officer didn't see it as it dropped to the ground, and then he felt his life was in danger because he thought Scott still had the taser.

    It could work. People really don't like to throw cops in the slammer.
     
    studthug12 likes this.
  2. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Running back 30 feet to pick up the Taser, then throwing it next to the body looks pretty hinky.
     
  3. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    Wait, maybe the officer was "standing his ground?"
     
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Under my theory that would be described as a panic move. Maybe a lesser offense, maybe the jury takes sympathy.
     
  5. murphyc

    murphyc Well-Known Member

    Is that generalization still true, or have events in the past year changed that? I have no idea how you'd be able to measure a change or shift, if there was one. I'm just throwing the question out.
     
  6. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Welp, this provides a pretty good case for cameras on cops, eh?

    Luckily, this one was filmed. Otherwise, this guy probably had a good chance of getting off.
     
  7. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Forensics still would have shown him shooting the guy in the back. And from far enough away that there certainly were no powder burns.
     
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    He'll walk anyway. Book it.
     
  9. Just the facts ma am

    Just the facts ma am Well-Known Member

    Interesting take from Greg Howard at Deadspin:

    The Police Are America's Terrorists

    I would argue that police culture which values elitism, bullying and conformity is at least equally responsible for bad actions as racism.
     
  10. Ruben Rivas

    Ruben Rivas Member

    A lazy person that shouldnt be a cop and shouldnt be allowed to own a gun.

    Good luck to him in jail.
     
  11. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    I'm pretty much in agreement with OT on this one.
    Cameras won't change police officers' behavior, particularly if they can just turn them on and off whenever they like (as most current body cameras allow).

    Police departments need better training, particularly as it relates to de-escalating situations. They need better psychological screening of recruits to identify those with anger issues, racist tendencies, and other psychological and emotional factors that could lead to such incidents. There are a lot of root causes to these kinds of incidents that need to be addressed. The cameras might score some political points because people will think their local government is DOING something to stop the problem, but realistically, cameras won't solve anything.
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    The camera would have had as much a chance of surviving this incident as Aaron Hernandez's cell phone did his incident.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page